It is pretty impressive that in a week where you would think all focus would have been on the State of the Union address, Trump and his cronies have actually managed to distract from it by attempting to delegitimize the people who may well bring Trump down.
I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating: If the GOP had had this mindset back in the 1970s, Nixon would have finished his second term with no problem.
Imagine if Nixon had adopted Trump’s tactics from the very beginning. Dismissing the Washington Post or the New York Times as failing and fake news. Finding whatever dirt he could on Senator Sam Ervin to prove that the investigations were illegitimate and part of a long-time grudge against Nixon. The Supreme Court ordered him to turn over the tapes, the existence of which John Dean revealed in testimony. Nixon would have just continued to deny the tapes ever existed and then immediately burned them. Easy peasy.
But it’s 40+ decades since that time, and both the GOP and the presidency have devolved into something that the 1970s version would never have recognized.
1). STATE OF THE UNIOM. Trump’s address was pretty much what every non-Trump lover expected it to be. A string of lies and exaggerations, with the Democrats reacting in pretty much the exact same way that the GOP acted when Obama would give the same speech. Except for omitting his favorite two word phrase, Fake News, from the speech, he lived down to expectations. He made a sideswipe at Football. He repeatedly applauded himself. He stood there and claimed that his and Congress’ job was to serve the people even though he is a self-absorbed, egotistical narcissist. He declared “Americans are dreamers” in the same way that white supremacists declare “white lives matter,” attempting to undercut a movement by broadening it so that it becomes irrelevant. And he reiterated his attempt to hold Dreamers hostage by forcing Congress to cough up $25 billion to build his idiotic wall…a project that the majority of Americans polled don’t want.
And afterwards, the rating-obsessed Trump declared that his speech, watched by 46 million people, was the most viewed speech in history. No. Obama had more. Clinton had more. But the fact that the Nielsen company flat out stated that this was a lie will likely not prevent him from saying it in the future. Because for Trump, the truth doesn’t exist; only his opinion and self-aggrandizing words matter.
2). THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSTIGATORS. One almost has to admire the obscene lengths that Trump’s GOP is willing to go to to protect him. While the 1970s GOP was aware that Nixon was up to no good and was willing to hold him to the high standard of the office, the 21st Century GOP is willing to fall in line and do whatever is necessary to keep him in office. I suppose the one I’m most contemptuous of is Ted Cruz, considering Trump insulted his wife and accused his father of being involved in the JFK assassination.
And so Cruz et al are overseeing the release of a memo that ostensibly “proves” that the FBI have it out for Trump. It’s an obvious technique: They know that Trump is going to be proven to have been involved with Russia, and so are trying to show that anything they come up with can be easily dismissed. The reasoning is that if the source is tainted, then so is everything they could present. Both the FBI and the Justice Department have stated that the memo contained falsehoods and distortions, but that’s not stopping Trump’s people. Because they are aware that both the average American citizen and pretty much all of Trump’s supporters don’t care about much of anything except headlines. If they are told that the FBI and the Justice Department are out to get Trump, that is absolutely all they will care about. They won’t read beyond that to learn that the memo proves nothing. They won’t care when proof of Trump’s actions is presented because they will dismiss it as manufactured by people who have a reason to bring him down. No one ever questioned the motives of those pursuing Watergate; today’s mindset would have made the entire confrontation a case of “Who do you believe?” with the assumption of innocence being given to the president.
Part of me looks at the 1950s and the government-led search for Communists that destroyed so many lives, and I take satisfaction in how far we’ve come since those days. I also look at how far we’ve come from Watergate, and take no satisfaction in it at all.
PAD






Recent Comments