My schedule for New York Comic Con

Posted By: Peter DavidPosted On:

I will be set up most of the next three days over in Artists Alley at Table U1. Tragically, neither Bono nor the Edge will be at the adjacent table, although we will have the next best thing: J.K. Woodward. So if you want your “Fallen Angel” or your copy of “The Camelot Papers” signed, now’s the time.

Friday at 1 PM, I’ll be signing at the Marvel booth. At 5 PM I’ll be signing at the Evil Ink table promoting my work with Coheed and Cambria.

Saturday at 11 AM I’m on a panel about Independent publishing, promoting Crazy 8.

Sunday at 3:30 PM I’m on the mutant panel.

See you around.

PAD

4 comments on “My schedule for New York Comic Con”

  1. Peter, do you know which rooms the two panels will be in?

    Incidentally, the Marvel Booth is Booth 654.

    The Evil Ink Booth is Booth 1345.

  2. Hey, PAD,
    I was wondering if you could read spanish, because in ADLO’s blog, they posted some very nice comments on your X-Factor (recently reprinted in Spain) (http://blog.adlo.es/2011/09/tebeos_raros.html#comments)
    Now, you must understand that the comments and reviews on the site are all high on sarcasm (the blog started and remains a “Pro”-Liefeld blog, for instance). In the reviews, two comics readers discuss this new super weird book from a newcomer, Peter David, whom they don’t identify as a friend of Fraction or Kirkman, so he must be a nobody, naturally.
    The first super weird occurrence, is that the covers actually depict something from the plot, instead of a death, kiss, or posing by a character. Of course, the writer’s inexperience must be to blame for that unheard of waste of a hooking cover.
    Then, they conclude that is was a coincidence that there are actually transitions from scene to scene, as such a thing has not been heard of “(are you saying the scenes are intertwined instead of a cold cut?”)
    Then, the dialogues, being witty and fun, and getting in the way of fights, and being more than just a few random cool words; and what’s more, they actually define the chars. (” 3 pages in, and your realize that what you read is more important than what you see!”)
    And then, they compare you unfavorably to Hickman, ‘cuz unlike him, you did not make them feel stupid after reading the books because you actually dared to give a clear conclusion!
    How dare you!

  3. I want to know how you’ll handle anyone who wants their e-copy of “The Camelot Papers” autographed. ‘Cuz I know you have an answer for that already planned out…
    .
    J.

Comments are closed.