FREAK OUT FRIDAY – October 16, 2020

I did as I said I would:  I watched “Supernatural,” and don’t regret it for a moment.  I then tuned in to watch the last half hour of Biden:  he seemed natural, relaxed, and sane.

Then, in order to write this column, I sat down and watched the Trump town hall on Youtube.   

I am producing this commentary as I’m watching it.  Think of it as a belated live blog.  The good thing is that Kathleen is upstairs asleep and doesn’t have to deal with hearing Trump’s voice.

  1.  Savannah Guthrie starts out by asking him about his last negative Covid test, which the White House has been dodging.  Trump replies that he doesn’t remember being tested before the debate; Guthrie presses him on it and now he says he probably was tested.  So right off the bat, he changes his tune:  “Possibly I did, possibly I didn’t.”  Let’s face facts:  he knew that he had it and was hoping to give it to Biden.
  •  He claims that he’s not against masks.  Another lie.  He disparages Biden for wearing them and refuses to wear one himself.  People actually pay attention to what he says and does.  And Guthrie isn’t letting him get away with it.   She’s calling him on the hypocrisy.
  • “On the excess mortality, we’re a winner.”  What in the HÊLL is he talking about?  Guthrie rightly points out that our per capita death rate is the highest in the world and all he does is talk about Regeneron.  She asked him about whether he is in favor of letting more people die and throw it out to herd immunity, which he doesn’t answer.  Instead he claims that millions could have died, and Guthrie again nails him by pointing out that number is based on a study speculating about deaths if the government had done nothing.  
  • He claims he denounces white supremacy but can’t help going after Antifa and the left anyway.  And now he states once again that he knows nothing about QAnon, which is the EXACT same answer he gave weeks ago. Even if it was true then, he did nothing to research it or investigate a movement that his own FBI equates with terrorism?  Doesn’t he understand that constantly saying “I don’t know about it” regarding things that everyone else in the country is aware of makes him look like a dámņëd idiot? 
  • God, he is SO defensive.  She’s pressing him and he keeps bìŧçhìņg and whining and pìššìņg and moaning.  
  • “You’re the President! You’re not like somebody’s crazy uncle who can retweet whatever.”  That’s the best observation any news person has ever made to his face.  
  • “Your own FBI director says there’s no evidence of voter fraud.”  “Well then he’s not doing a very good job.”  That’s Trump right there.  Bad mouth the law enforcement agency that, oh yes, just rounded up a bunch of white supremacists who wanted to kidnap and execute the governor of Virginia.  Yes, that’s very supportive.  I’m sure they appreciate it. 
  • “There is in fact no evidence of widespread voter fraud.”  She’s absolutely right and he won’t admit it.  He’s still operating under the delusion he’s going to win.
  • Yet another lie:  everyone in the room wanted Trump to do the travel ban.  They had to talk him into it.  And then he turned around and claimed that it was entirely his idea and everyone else opposed him.  Also Biden did NOT call him xenophobic and racist because of the China shut down; he called him that because he IS xenophobic and racist.
  1.  And Guthrie real-time fact checks him again.  No one is saying 40 percent unemployment; as Guthrie points out, twenty percent, yes, not double that.  
  1. “I was okay with the masks” says the man whose behavior has turned masks into a political question that has divided the country.  My God, the bûllšhìŧ that just radiates from this man is palpable. 
  1. “We’re always protecting people with pre-existing conditions.”  No.  He’s not.  His people are pushing forward a case to the SCOTUS that would eliminate it entirely.  Ah, and Guthrie is nailing him on it.  And yet again he hauls out his dodge about how he’s going to replace it with a much better program WHICH DOES NOT EXIST.  He’s been claiming it for almost four years and has produced NOTHING.  
  1. Trump was the one who shut down conversations about the stimulus package and naturally he blames Pelosi for it.  He cannot take responsibility for anything.  And Guthrie is continuing to hold his feet to the fire.  He keeps trying to toss it back to Pelosi and Guthrie is making it painfully obvious that he’s shucking and jiving.  Trump says he can’t ask the Republicans to agree to it because of Pelosi?  Does that make sense to anyone aside from Trump?
  1. No, Biden does NOT want to raise taxes on middle income taxpayers.  Yet another lie.  
  1. $420 million is a small amount of money?  Seriously?
  1. He’s “treated badly” by the IRS?  Is anyone treated WELL by the IRS?  It’s the IRS’s job to take money away from you, not to treat you with kid gloves.  And he keeps repeating the lie that he will eventually release his tax returns.  Along with his “repeal and replace” lie, it’s one of his favorites.  He claims “I wouldn’t mind saying” who he owes money to, and then of course doesn’t say anything specific.  Deny, deny, deny.  
  1.  And once again Guthrie confronts him with his hypocrisy, pointing out that back in 2016 he stated Obama should not be allowed to appoint a new judge to the SCOTUS.  His response is to claim that the grilling of Judge Cavanaugh “changed the game.”  How?  How did that hearing take McConnell and the GOP and Trump himself off the hook of being raging hypocrites?  
  1. An interesting question from an anti-choicer (a term I feel is far more accurate than Pro-Lifer):  if they managed to overturn Roe v. Wade, as Trump is trying to do, what protections would be put in place when the mother’s life is in danger?  And of course he didn’t answer it.  Didn’t even come close.  Didn’t address it at all.  He won’t even admit that he wants to get rid of a woman’s right to choose.  Instead he just claims that he wants the SCOTUS to make a decision on it.  News flash:  They DID make a decision in 1973, and the GOP has been trying to overturn it ever since.  Trump is trying to slam Barrett through so that she can be part of a 6-3 majority to overturn it and yet doesn’t have the balls to admit that that’s what he’s doing.
  1. The reason we don’t like it when he says he’s done more for the African-American community than any president since Lincoln is because it’s a lie.  Off the top of my head, Lyndon Johnson signed Civil Rights into existence.  That was pretty dámņëd significant.  Trump’s boasts of what he’s done are, to put it mildly, dubious.  And of course this woman doesn’t get her question answered either.
  • “We’re going to take care of DACA.”  Yes, just like a Mafioso “takes care” of people he considers enemies.  He then goes on to claim that he’s built four hundred miles of border wall, up from his previous claim of three hundred.  Actual amount he’s built:  thirty miles.  The rest is just repairs on already existing structures.  
  • God, the fact checkers are going to be so busy tearing apart his final comments.  It’s nothing but lies, lies and exaggerations.

Kathleen would have blown her brains out if she’d had to watch this.

I’ll tell you this:  I don’t watch the Today Show, but I might just start doing so to follow this Savannah Guthrie.  It was great to watch her fact-check him in real time.

I honestly don’t know how anyone could be undecided at this point.  Contrast Trump’s rambling, ill-mannered, disingenuous, finger-pointing accusatory style with Biden’s measured, practiced tone, and anyone with two functioning brain cells to rub together can see which one should be leading this country for the next four years.

PAD

15 comments on “FREAK OUT FRIDAY – October 16, 2020

  1. “He’s still operating under the delusion he’s going to win.” I don’t think he is. I think he knows he’s gonna lose badly and is setting up his defense.

    “An interesting question from an anti-choicer (a term I feel is far more accurate than Pro-Lifer):” – I use the term “Pro-Birther”, but I also like to comment that the opposite of pro-choice isn’t pro-birth, it’s anti-choice.

  2. The events were supposed to be “town halls,” where regular voters could ask questions of the candidates.

    For Trump, Savannah Guthrie monopolized the opening 20 minutes, asked 43 questions herself, allowed the audience only 10 questions, and spent most of her time debating Trump. So much for being a “moderator;” she acted as an interviewer/debater.

    For Biden, he was “moderated” by Bill Clinton’s former press secretary who lobbed him nothing but softballs, and one of the “undecided” voters had been a speechwriter for Obama during the Obama/Biden administration. And not one question about Hunter Biden, whose literally every single job has been one provided by people seeking his father’s favor and approval.

    It really was a very informative and useful exercise in comparing and contrasting.

      1. Please, elaborate. Just what specific things did I cite clash with reality? Did “moderator” Guthrie not ask far more questions than the voters brought in to ask them? Was Mr. Osborn not a speech writer for the Obama administration? Was Mr. Stephanopolous not Bill Clinton’s press secretary?

      2. She asked questions for about fifteen minutes. The audience then took up forty-five minutes. Most of her questions followed up the answers he gave the questioners, oftentimes pointing out his lies and contradictions. And yes, she was the moderator, but there is nothing in the definition of the position that indicates she can’t do her job as a reporter. The moderator simply oversees an event; there’s no requirement not to actively participate, no matter how much the right wing tries to act as if she was out of line.

        Osborn may have been a speechwriter for Obama, but perhaps he was still undecided between voting for Biden or perhaps a third party candidate,

        Yes Stephanopolous was Clinton’s press secretary. So? Biden’s run in opposition to Clinton’s wife. So why would he get a free pass?

        PAD

      3. According to Merriam Webster, the most applicable definition of “moderator” is “the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting.” And in my experiences as presiding officer, it was clear in Robert’s Rules that presiding officers do NOT participate in the debate, they simply make sure that all participants follow the rules. The times I wanted to take part, I had to turn over the gavel to another.

        And as far as Mr. Osborn goes, him being simply identified as an “undecided voter” when his background was so readily available and relevant that for it to be omitted means that either the hosts were either grossly incompetent, or (once again) thought they could stack the deck.

        Personally, I’m just hoping they frisked him for Goblin Bombs before the event, but I don’t recall him having red hair, so he might have been safe…

      4. I will say I am pleasantly surprised that my comments haven’t been deleted. There are a lot of sites where you aren’t allowed to go against the majority.

        Look, I kinda get it. I don’t particularly like Trump, either. I held my nose when I voted for him in 2016. I tend to turn off the TV when he comes on. He grates on me.

        But I have to step back and look at the bigger picture. And I am very pleasantly impressed.

        1) We have renegotiated, fairer agreements with Mexico and Canada.

        2) Our NATO allies are far closer to living up to their treaty obligations and not counting on us to pick up their slack.

        3) A lot of manufacturing jobs returned to the US from Asia, especially China.

        4) Trump, unlike his predecessors since… oh, geez, Carter? Hoover? has yet to get us involved in any new foreign conflicts, and actually got us out of a couple started by Obama.

        5) He’s got a peace plan going in the Middle East that has achieved far more since Carter’s Camp David accords, and shows even more promise as Israel actually starts to establish formal relations with its neighbors.

        6) Last spring, we were told that COVID’s worst case was 2 million deaths, and best case was 200,000. 7 months later, we’re not that far beyond the best case scenario.

        7) Up until the shutdown, economic gains by blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities had been better than at any point in US history. And unemployment was at the lowest since the days Stan Lee and Jack Kirby were still working on The Fantastic Four.

        And not to put too fine a point on it, several of those accomplishments were declared impossible by Obama. 1, 3, and 5 in particular stand out.

        For that, I’ll happily ignore the crassness and obnoxious comments, the irritating persona, and other annoying aspects. That’s all shallow; I can put up with it in exchange for results like these, and several more.

  3. There’s no point in arguing with someone who supports Trump. It’s like speaking to a rock. Pointless. They’ll find any excuse to ignore his behavior and blame it on others. Says this republican who is for country over party.

    1. Then I guess there’s no point in arguing with someone who says that there’s no point in arguing. No free exchange of opinions and ideas, no questions, no attempts to persuade others with words and thoughts, no civil discourse.

      So, Edward, should we put you down for secession and civil war? Where will you be establishing my “re-education camp?”

      1. We don’t NEED to build a re-education camp. We can ask to borrow the ones Trump approved of China making to enslave their muslum population.

      2. Then I guess I’m glad I’m backing the guy who’s putting all kinds of squeezes on China, and not backing the guy who is supported by the NBA, Disney, most of Hollywood, academia, and all the other people willing to overlook China’s human right atrocities as long as they keep that Chinese money flowing.

    1. Invoking the bubble, are we? Pleading for a (polite and respectful) dissenting voice be silenced, lest the consensus be disturbed and the status quo challenged?

      Alan Dershowitz has often said that the best counter for bad speech is more speech, and I’ve always respected that sentiment — even when I’m considered as providing the “bad” speech. And I personally find it refreshing to venture out of the “echo chambers” both political ends offer and see what I might discern from those who disagree with me. A few times it’s shaken up my beliefs, and I think that’s a healthy thing.

  4. $420 million is a small amount of money? Seriously?

    [sarc]Well, sure, when you’re a very very wealthy billionaire, making money bigly as you govern the nation wisely, fairly and better than any President before you.[/sarc]

Comments are closed.