The non-politicizing of CBG, except where some folks on the Dixonverse are concerned

Over on the Dixonverse.net board, an interesting discussion has cropped up involving CBG columnists and the ostensible politicization thereof. Which is remarkably hilarious since CBG editor Maggie Thompson actually bends over backwards to AVOID political content.

John Jackson Miller’s article “Blue States vs. Red States” is falsely described as a political polemic touting Blue State superiority. It is, in fact,a detailed and thoughtful analysis of how comic book sales and existing stores break down along geographic lines, and even features a lengthy sidebar interview with a retailer who is not only a huge advocate of labeling, but laments “Comics do not reflect mid-American culture.” The same poster then goes on to say that I compare the “fight” of the CBLDF in Georgia to the censorship of the Nazis, and then complains about “clueless, elitist artists.” Chuck Dixon also weighed in to complain about how politics or political views had no place in comics centering on the adventures of costumed iconic superheroes. In case anyone’s interested–and since it’s come to my attention that folks hereabouts seem to like political discussion–this is what I wrote in response to the guy complaining about clueless artists:

On a related note

Since this is related to the case but a tangent, I’ll post it separately since it could likely engender a whole different discussion.

What occurs to me is that if the person in a coma were one half of a gay married couple, if the spouse were advocating that all extreme measures SHOULD be taken to keep the comatose mate going, and it was the parents who were saying the patient should be starved to death…

Congress wouldn’t touch it with a ten meter cattle prod.

PAD