Year: 2005

We’ll make a deal: we’ll stop desecrating the flag and the Pledge of Allegiance when they stop desecrating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Star Trek pledge of allegiance gets kid suspended: “Cory Doctorow:
A young Star Trek fan was suspended from school for reciting his own version of the Pledge of Allegiance, in which he pledged to the United Federation of Planets. His mom has posted the hilarious story:

‘So, anyway. What did he do?’ I picked at the hem of my sweatshirt, looked just to the right of her face. I couldn’t meet her eyes. I felt nervous. I felt underdressed. I wondered where 8 was.

So she told me what he did. And as she told me, I started to laugh. I didn’t laugh a little, either, but I belly-laughed and grabbed my stomach. My son stood with his class this morning, put small right hand over heart, faced the American flag, and recited his own personal pledge of allegiance:

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United Federation of Planets, and to the galaxy for which it stands, one universe, under everybody, with liberty and justice for all species.

‘Mrs. Jaworski. This isn’t humorous. The Pledge is an extremely important and patriotic moment each morning in the classroom. I am ashamed of your son’s behavior, and I hope you are, too.’

Link“

(Via Boing Boing.)

It’s baaaaaack. The proposed brand new amendment that makes a mockery out of the First One:

“The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

I mean, this concept should be elementary. This should be American Citizenship 101. The flag stands for a nation with freedoms, including the freedom to burn the flag in protest.

I’ve always said that I wasn’t a fan of flag-burning as a means of protest, because it’s such a (pardon the expression) incendiary visual that whatever other point you wanted to make is going to be obscured by that action. So I don’t think it’s terribly effective in terms of convincing others. But the Congress…you know, the ones who shall make no law interfering with freedom of expression?…apparently didn’t get the memo.

And hey…all those articles of clothing with the flag adorning it? Notebooks? Forget it. What about decals or bumper stickers, with the image of the American flag getting spattered by mud and dirt. Pull that SUV over, fella…you with that foul bumpersticker and your girlfriend with the stars and stripes bikini top! You’re under arrest courtesy of Congress!

You can’t burn the flag of the United States by burning a representation of it any more than you can burn the Declaration of Independence by burning a copy of it.

You can, however, incinerate the concept of freedom of speech in this country by making a constitutional amendment banning a form of expression for the worst possible reason: It upsets people. No other reason. No one’s reputation stands to be defamed, no money lost. No child’s delicate mind is going to be threatened from the sight. No panics from “fire” falsely cried in a crowded theater (indeed, nowadays the major challenge is finding a theater that’s crowded.) There’s no cover here. It’s naked censorship, a throttling of free expression by the very governmental body that’s sworn to protect it.

Plus the GOP’s gotta love it because liberals must either embrace the notion–which is antithetical to anyone who has a grasp of free speech, to say nothing of making them indistinguishable from conservatives–or else they must spend countless man hours explaining why they value free expression above cheap political opportunism…and lose the vote of every schmuck who can’t wrap his tiny mind around defending to the death one’s right to express an opinion that that same person may find personally repellant. Puts them in a nice position for the next election.

And, of course, anyone opposed to a flag burning amendment is deemed “out of touch” with the citizenry. You know what? I’d rather be out of touch with the citizenry than out of touch with the concept of free expression.

PAD

UPDATE:

Specific quotes:

‘Ask the men and women who stood on top of the Trade Center,’ said Rep. Randy (Duke) Cunningham, R-Calif. ‘Ask them and they will tell you: pass this amendment.’

‘If the flag needs protection at all, it needs protection from members of Congress who value the symbol more than the freedoms that the flag represents.’ said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., whose district includes the site of the former World Trade Center. –GH

I seem to have come in late on this whole “Who’s the Greatest American?” thing. I haven’t seen any lists or anything, so I’m just talking off the top of my head.

Even after all the intervening centuries, and even with what we know of some of the more dubious activities in his private life, I’d still go with Thomas Jefferson.

Runners up to my mind would include FDR, Jonas Salk, Martin Luther King, and my wife. I’d also put my mom and dad, but they weren’t born in this country so I’m not sure they’d be eligible.

PAD

Does anyone know if there were law suits as a result of the famous radio broadcast that panicked Americans across the country?

Because I’m thinking that if the same thing happened now, the number of law suits filed would be so staggering, that the radio network would be put out of business, the sponsors would all have pulled their support, and the Mercury Theater would have been sued into bankruptcy and beyond.

I tell ya, you just can’t terrorize people and get away with it anymore.

PAD

It’s already been announced at www.newsarama.com, but I figure we should stay on top of things here as well. JK Woodward will be the new artist for “Fallen Angel,” and a sample of his work is below. There seems to be a misconception by some Newsarama denizens that this is merely a cover and they’re withholding judgment until they see the pencils. No, this is Woodward’s style. The entire book will have this painted look to it. What you see here is what you’ll be getting cover-to-cover.

The answer, of course, is no, because I’ve been to my brother’s website, and it’s got much spiffier pictures than I do.

Wally David, for whom Wally the God Boy was named, has set up his website at http://www.wallydavid.com. Among other things, he’s a top flight photographer and I invite you all to go and check out his material.

PAD

Spending a relatively quiet “Father’s Day.” It’s interesting in that it’s two-way: On the one hand, naturally I call my dad and wish him the best of the day. On the other hand, I’ve got my daughters calling me wishing me the same. Not to go all “Lion King,” but you get a real feeling of the circle of life. That it’s more than the simple status of being a father, but more of a sense of being part of an ongoing sense of responsibility and commitment.

I remember when I was a kid, falling asleep in the back seat of the car when we’d be coming home from a long trip. I did so with nary a concern, utterly confident that I would wake up safe and sound back home. These days, of course, I’m in the front seat, with my daughters peacefully dozing in the back of the car, equally trusting that I’ll get them safely to their destination. Metaphorically, I suppose, that’s my job for all aspects of their lives.

Hëll of a responsibility. Then again, I knew the job was dangerous when I took it.

PAD