Movie review: Casper

digresssmlOriginally published June 23, 1995, in Comics Buyer’s Guide #1127

It must be getting fairly frustrating for Marvel. With its sole big screen release being the much-maligned Howard the Duck, it seems that everyone else is able to turn their characters (Superman, Batman, TimeCop, the Rocketeer, the Mask, the Crow, Swamp Thing, Tank Girl) into big screen stories with far greater ease and frequency. The results, both critical and financial, have been mixed—but that’s going to happen with any genre.

Now another company can be added to the roster of those who have beaten Marvel to the punch, when it comes to producing a successful screen translation of one of its characters: Harvey Comics, with the advent of Casper.

And I’ll tell you: The film is, for my money, one of the best comic book adaptations, bar none.

Why? Because, ironically, the titular character has no blood, no musculature, no bones—indeed, he’s the incarnation of one thing that the movie genuinely has: soul.

And a heart. Casper is not a pint-sized version of Beetlejuice, Ghostbusters or any other broadly played ghost farces, despite its comic book origins and the presence of The Ghostly Trio. Rather, writers Sherri Stoner and Deanna Oliver (whose previous work includes marvelous stints on Tiny Toon Adventures and Animaniacs, although Oliver did create Chicken-Boo, for which she will not soon be forgiven) have opted to go the genuine Ghost route, subbing The Addams Family‘s Christina Ricci for Demi Moore and Casper (effectively voiced by Malachi Pearson) for Patrick Swayze. (And, for my money, Casper’s a better dancer.)

As a result, Casper is sometimes light on humor, soft on villainy (Cathy Moriarty and Eric Idle, hard-working but wasted in roles that one solid rewrite could have eliminated altogether) but long on—longing.

Whereas Casper in the cartoons was a whiny shlepper, and Casper in the comics was good for a few pages of gags but paled (sorry) beside the far more interesting Spooky, Wendy the Good Little Witch, et al, the live-action Casper is wistful, funny, eager to please, and wears his emotions on the surface because he hasn’t got anyplace else to hide them.

When Casper brushes his “lips” against would-be girlfriend Kat’s (Ricci’s) face as she is about to fall asleep for the night, she sleepily asks him to close the window because she feels a chill. His sadness at his limited and negative physical interaction is palpable.

Director Brad Silberling gets excellent performances out of his actors—a considerable achievement when one considers that Ricci and Bill Pullman (as her psychiatrist dad, Dr. James [nudge nudge, wink wink, get this] Harvey) spend many scenes acting to empty air. And James Horner’s score is (sorry again) haunting.

There are some mildly annoying plot holes (the electricity in the haunted house not being turned on until the Harveys arrive, yet earlier on Casper is watching television; the concept of ghosts being ghosts because they have “unfinished business” being unevenly applied: that sort of thing). But compared to the great gaping holes in, say, the Batman movies, it’s nothing I couldn’t live with.

And the story has the nerve to address what has always been the underlying thing-no-one-discusses: Casper is a dead child. Gotta be. Last time I checked, ghosts come from dead people, and Casper by his design and attitude is clearly a child—a deceased kid.

The only time I saw the concept dealt with before was an issue of Marvel’s now defunct Crazy magazine. The movie isn’t as morbid as that issue’s “Casper the Dead Baby,” thank God, and there were scenes in Casper that genuinely got me misty-eyed—not just me, in fact; my family, as well.

For Casper is that comic book rarity, a family film. So much so, in fact, that I decided to have a family member step in and give her view on Casper: past contributor to But I Digress, Shana David (age 14 these days, for people who are keeping track):

Every once in a while, a movie will come out that sounds like such a complete waste of film that I don’t want to bother to see it. This, I thought, would be the case with the new movie Casper, based on the cartoon about a friendly ghost. I figured it would be scene after scene of slapstick comedy that supposedly had a main theme and a plot.

Despite these apprehensions, I went to the sneak preview accompanied by my father, two sisters, and the four glow-in-the-dark Casper puppets from Pizza Hut that we had purchased earlier in the day. I expected to be underwhelmed. I was surprised to see a touching film that did have a plot. And an excellent one, at that.

The movie centered around a young girl (Christina Ricci) and her ghost psychologist father (Bill Pullman) who are asked to move into an old haunted house to help rid it of ghosts. Ricci’s character is scared at first, when she meets Casper and has to spend a good portion of the movie getting to know him (this part sort of drags). The rest of the movie is about their adventures in trying to save the house and so forth. It sounds like the sort of thing that would be predictable and boring, but it wasn’t. The combination of excellent acting, writing, and direction made it all unique and interesting.

One thing that I liked in particular was that the movie wasn’t afraid to face truths—like that Casper is, in fact, a dead child: depressing but true. Also explaining what exactly happened to Casper, along with his feelings about other people, was an excellent idea.

Somehow, in my sick, twisted mind, I managed to relate the Casper movie to The Who’s Tommy (which I recently saw performed on Broadway). Now, there are the obvious similarities, but I saw more. As follows:

Both Tommy and Casper live in a world where they are ignored and almost feared by the people around them. Tommy is ignored and feared because he doesn’t speak—Casper because he isn’t alive. Tommy spends countless amounts of time looking at his reflection in the mirror, trying to find out who he is, while the people around him haunt him by asking, “Tommy can you hear me?” He really is saying what he wants (“See me, feel me, touch me, heal me”), but it’s the “regular” people who can’t hear him. Casper looks at the reflection of what he is trying to find (life) by looking at people who are living. They run screaming because they think that he is haunting them for no reason, but if they listened they would realize that what he wants is friend (“Can I keep you?”)

The Acid Queen asks Tommy to join her, because she is also a person who can’t be heard. He refuses because he is considered too good. Casper’s uncles want Casper to join them, but Casper is too good and friendly for that, too.

If you had never seen Tommy or never knew exactly what it was about before, you will have to see it because it is an excellent play. The movie Tommy isn’t so hot, but it serves its purpose.

You know, I’m getting to be more and more like my father every day. I start off talking about something and, before I’m done, I stray completely from the topic.

Speaking of straying from the topic, everyone in the world who is even slightly sick of our favorite football player should read O.J.’s Legal Pad. It is hilarious—completely fabricated, but hilarious nevertheless. My personal favorite is when a panic stricken OJ writes a note saying “Johnnie, quick! In front of the jury, did I limp on my left leg or my right?

I know my dad is going to be furious because I only wrote a few paragraphs reviewing Casper and about a page talking about other stuff. Oh well. But I digress.

(Shana David, eldest daughter of Peter David, writer of stuff, finds it amusing that her local movie theater paired the Casper sneak preview with Village of the Ðámņëd. Tee hee.)

Everyone’s always trying to steal my style. Hmmf.

In any event, Shana may have put her finger on what makes Casper so effective as a character in this film. How often have teenagers felt disaffected, even invisible, only wanting a friend, and wishing they could be liked for the type of person they are?

That pretty much covers Casper. Kat Harvey can only like Casper for his personality, because there’s no body to go with it. And there’s the ominous truth of Casper’s deceased status. With violence in schools and death a possible consequence of sexual activity, mortality is much more in-your-face than it was when we were kids. Casper is life-affirming. Nowadays, particularly in comics-related material, that’s a breath of fresh air—from someone who can’t even draw a breath.

(Peter David, writer of stuff, can be written to at Second Age, Inc., PO Box 239, Bayport, NY 11705. Yeah, the Village of the Ðámņëd tie-in was amusing. So is the marquee at a local multiplex which features, on one line: Die Hard Casper.)


12 comments on “Movie review: Casper

  1. Interestingly enough, you liked that the movie broke Harvey’s #1 rule regarding Casper: ghosts are not dead people. Probably feeling that the subject was just a little heavy for what was considered a “funny animal comic”, Harvey Comics laid down the rule that ghosts don’t come from dead people but are instead magical creatures in their own right. Ghosts are born ghosts and have ghost parents, etc.

    Perhaps the idea that Casper was a traditional ghost in the “spirit of a dead person” way was just something a little ahead of its time. Especially considering how no one even said “boo” about it when this movie came out.

    1. Ghosts are not dead people in Casper comics? Jesus. This is one of the most retarded things I’ve ever heard. Why use ghosts in the first place if they don’t want to address death? Not to mention that it’s a great opportunity to teach kids about a thorny, painful subject in a light way.

      1. More retarded than the Maggia (“Did you say ‘Mafia?’? “No, I said ‘Maggia.'”) or zuvembies (“Did you say…”)?

      2. I am afraid so. I mean, Maggia is silly as hëll and I don’t know for sure why Marvel thought they had to change it. I mean, fear of offending mobsters? As if switching one word would make a difference. Or is there some Comics Code thing that forbiddens the use of the Mafia in comics? I know that is the reason for “zuvembies.”
        .
        Still, if you change a letter of their name but keep the concept exactly the same, then it’s funny, but not outrageous. But, dámņ, ghosts that aren’t dead people is so retarded as setting a kid story in a condom fabric and saying condoms are actually a sort of protective gear for fingers in rainy days.
        .
        If death is taboo for kids, then why use a f*cking ghost in the story?

      3. Sorry, by “fabric” I meant FACTORY.
        .
        The Portuguese word if “fabrica”, and I incorrectly translated it as fabric.

      4. “Why use ghosts in the first place?”

        Well, the joke (pretty much the only joke in Casper comics) tends to be that ghosts are supposed to be scary, but Casper is friendly. His uncles want him to be scary, but he doesn’t want to. Yet, when he tries to make friends with anyone who’s not a ghost, they inevitably get scared upon meeting him. Usually, with the person screaming “A g-g-g-ghost!” and running away. They just never went into the “why” of ghosts being scary. The “why” in real life is because they’re associated with death. In Casper comics, ghosts are just scary because they’re scary.

        It was never a very deep comic. It was just a basic “funny animal” type comic that relied on one-page gag strips.

  2. In the early-Fox sitcom FLYING BLIND, one episode had the newly-dating Neil and Alicia trying to share each other’s interests. As they sit down in front of the TV, they have this exchange:

    NEIL: You’ve never seen CASPER THE FRIENDLY GHOST? The great thing about it is that Casper is a ghost — but he’s friendly!
    [they watch for a few seconds]
    ALICIA: He looks so small… How old was Casper when he died?
    [Neil clicks off the TV]

    1. I loved Flying Blind.
      I’m still hoping that FOX will come to their senses and uncancel it.

      1. That was a really good show. Although the anecdotal one-liners started getting annoying after a while (“just like the time my uncle so-and-so did such-and-such”).

  3. Shana was a great writer for a fourteen-year-old. And very similar in style to you. You didn’t do any ghost-writing, I hope.
    .
    Was Casper actually Harvey’s first character to have a movie? I thought Richie Rich was first, but my memory isn’t all that clear about which year it was, so I may very well be wrong.
    .
    It probably doesn’t matter, but I think Casper originated in the animated cartoons, and the comic-book appeared later. So he may not really count as a real comic character.
    .
    And I think ‘Kasper The Dead Baby’ appeared in an earlier Marvel humor magazine, before Crazy.
    .
    I’m being really pedantic today for some reason. Sorry.
    .
    I guess I didn’t like the Casper movie as much as you did, but it did have a lot of good qualities. I just didn’t think they were enough to make up for the dumb story with Cathy Moriarty and a few other things like that.

Comments are closed.