The Con Game

digresssmlOriginally published July 23, 1993, in Comics Buyer’s Guide #1027

I am about to tell you the shocking secret of The Con Game. Please do not tell anyone else, since you wouldn’t want to ruin it for them.

The Con Game occurred at the recent Great Eastern Convention in New York. Last time I wrote about Great Eastern, you will remember, it was the site of the Image incite-the-crowd-to-riot fiasco. I wasn’t there this time around, having a previous commitment for the weekend.

A week or so later, however, I received a phone call from friend and occasional collaborator James Fry. James, speaking with great ire, alerted me to something that had happened to a friend of his at the convention. It seemed such a bizarre story that I promptly contacted all concerned to find out just what had gone down.

And now BID will tell you:

Conventions routinely use volunteer workers to flesh out their staff. It’s a fairly harmless quid pro quo: Volunteer workers are given free admission, (plus free food at the classier conventions), and hobnob with the celebrities, in exchange for which they work their little keisters off doing whatever is needed to be done.

Charles, it would appear, has a shapelier keister than most. Charles, you see, is a professional female impersonator and “real life transvestite.” And Charles, who intended to volunteer at Great Eastern, decided that he was going to endeavor to get into the spirit of things by engaging in a time-honored convention practice. He was going to show up in costume.

“It was my idea,” he said. “I told them before I came that I wanted to do it.”

Whoever it was that Charles told, it wasn’t convention organizer Fred Greenberg. Nevertheless, Fred subsequently stated that, in principle, he “had no problem with it.”

The “it” being Charles’ choice of costume.

He showed up as Catwoman.

Specifically, in an eerily accurate re-creation of the leather number that Michelle Pfeiffer sported in Batman Returns.

Charles entered the convention floor in full costume, before the convention even started.

By early that afternoon, he was being escorted out, at the direct request of DC Comics personnel.

The stated reason? Fred Greenberg was told, “We don’t want (him) here because he’s getting pictures taken (of himself). This is not how we want Catwoman represented.” Charles was presenting, they told Greenberg, “the wrong tone” for the character.

Keep in mind, of course, that Catwoman–in current DC continuity–has an origin based in sado/masochism and prostitution. Even the movie version had massive sexual overtones. Catwoman has never exactly been the Flying Nun, and her sexuality has only become more explicit over the years.

With all that baggage that the “real” character is carrying, the concept of being portrayed by a male would seem relatively tame. Particularly when the portrayal was so perfect that no one was tumbling to it… no one, up to and including, Jim Balent, the artist on the Catwoman series.

The moment Catwoman made her appearance (for clarity’s sake, we’ll simply call Charles “her” when referring to the costumed persona) on the convention floor, Jim Balent spotted her. “The costume was very good,” said Jim. “I was impressed that a fan had dressed up in that costume.”

So impressed, in fact, that Jim immediately went over to her and brought her to the DC booth, to pose next to a Catwoman illustration. Jim himself also posed with her, spoke with her, and even talked to her about future modeling work for a series of fantasy artworks… all completely unaware of the model’s gender.

Jim’s offer was subsequently withdrawn (with no resentment on either side) upon learning that Catwoman was being portrayed by a man. “When I told the editors (that it was a guy), they laughed,” he said.

Not laughing, however, were DC representatives Rich and Vince.

Late that morning, according to Charles, “My supervisor for the day came over to me and said that they (DC) didn’t want me ‘hanging around’ their area.” The reason was not stated. Catwoman was surprised, considering her earlier warm reception, but obeyed their desire that she keep her distance.

So although Catwoman’s appearance and deportment was good enough to fool a professional artist, and dozens of fans who were asking to have their picture taken with her, it was apparently not good enough to stay within proximity of the company that published her.

And, eventually, not good enough even to stay at the convention.

Because a few hours later, at about 2:30, according to Fred Greenberg, Rich called him over and informed him, in no uncertain terms, that the masquerade was to be brought to an end. That either Catwoman was to leave the convention entirely, or change out of the costume into street clothes. “He said that this is just the exact kind of thing they didn’t want,” said Greenberg. “I was unclear on what the reason was.”

Was Catwoman off the mark somehow? That didn’t seem likely. The portrayal was so good, according to Jim Balent, that “I thought she was working for DC or Fred Greenberg.”

Perhaps that was the concern: That the costume was so good, it seemed “official.” But was Catwoman then to be penalized because the job was too good?

Of course, technically, parading around in a company-owned creator costume is a violation of trademark. And if Catwoman had put up a sign that said, “Have your picture taken with Catwoman, $5,” that would have been dangerously into the territory of unauthorized appearance.

Catwoman, however, was doing no such thing. Merely obliging various fans by posing.

Furthermore, in Greenberg’s seventeen years of putting on conventions, plenty of folks had shown up in costume and no one from DC had ever requested that they been removed. In fact, at shows such as the San Diego Comic Convention, DC gives out cash prizes at the masquerade for best costume.

So the sudden cold feet about the notion of a fan-in-costume struck Greenberg as somewhat odd.

Nevertheless, Fred felt he had no option.

He took Charles aside and apprised him of the situation. “I made it clear to him,” Greenberg said, “that it was not my doing. I was very much on the guy’s side. But he was getting me into hot water with DC. I told him, ‘DC doesn’t want you to wear it. Either take it off or leave.’”

But Charles had no clothes to change into. “Would it really be preferable,” asked Charles, “if I were walking around in my underwear instead of the costume?”

Trying to come to some sort of accord, Charles asked that he be allowed to speak directly to the folks at the DC table who wanted him gone. Fred gamely agreed.

As they approached the DC table, a man walked over with his two small daughters. He had a camera, and asked Fred, “Can they have their pictures taken with Catwoman?”

“Not right now,” Fred said hurriedly, and hastened Catwoman on her way, leaving the puzzled father and children behind. It was that single moment, Charles said, that he found more upsetting than anything else about the entire incident.

There was a crowd around the DC table, and Fred instructed Catwoman to hang back while he approached Rich. He told Rich of Catwoman’s desire to try and sort matters out.

According to Greenberg, Rich told him, “Listen, I said I want this person out. I’ve said everything I’m going to say.”

And that was that. Minutes later, DC reps had managed to accomplish what Batman hasn’t managed to do in half a century: Get rid of Catwoman.

Sadly, it didn’t occur to Charles to turn around and buy a ticket into the convention. It would have put Fred into an interesting position because, as the convention organizer, he felt he had to accede to DC’s wishes when it came to a volunteer worker. But would he have then kept out a paying customer? “It would have raised some interesting legal questions,” he said. In all likelihood, Charles would have been able to march back in in full costume.

But the fact that he was ordered gone by DC had taken a lot of the fun out of it for him. However the cat, as the song goes, came back… and wrote to DC, complaining of his treatment.

And DC, to their credit, moved quickly. After looking into the incident, DC veep Paul Levitz wrote to Charles. The letter said, in part:

“Please accept our apologies for the incident at the Great Eastern comic convention…

“For the record, neither our policies nor, based on our investigation, the motivations of our staffer, were based on the gender of the person in the costume or your possible sexual orientation. Our policies are simply to try to ensure that when a promotional event is staged… only the authorized licensee of DC provides the talent… to ensure that our trademarks are protected in accordance with the legal requirements placed on us by the trademark law. However, what you did, showing up in a comic convention in costume, is a tradition going back over two decades, and is one we are entirely supportive of.

“We believe that this experience aside, you have no reason to brand DC as homophobic, and that we have exhibited a sincere (as opposed to simply politically correct) commitment to non-discrimination based on sexual preference… I hope you will accept our apology for this incident, and continue to be a satisfied customer.”

It’s a remarkable bit of irony, really. When Marvel Comics had Northstar publicly state that he was gay, it caused a major media brouhaha. Marvel then promptly closed ranks, issued terse “No comments” to all subsequent inquiries, and a wave of conservatism swept through the editorial ranks (the first victim being my own story about abortion in X-Factor which was gutted and rewritten into near-incomprehensibility.)

This is as opposed to DC who, in their mainline comics and Vertigo line, has had consistent portrayals of people with all manner of sexual orientation… and nary a word has been said about it. And then, bam, this happens.

And it had to be Catwoman. Catwoman, the single kinkiest character in mainline DC continuity. If anyone should have an aura of “anything goes” surrounding her, it’s Catwoman.

Now if any Marvel sales or promotional folks are reading this and chuckling to themselves, and thinking, “Wow, we’d never have reacted like that…”

Charles’ next costume is going to be either Storm or Psylocke.

Tread carefully in how you proceed, gentlemen, lest the cat be once again let out of the bag.

(Peter David, writer of stuff will be appearing as Wonder Woman at the next Great Eastern Convention… or maybe not.)


18 comments on “The Con Game

  1. Such a shame this happened in the years before the web was widespread. If ever a story was crying out for pictorial supplements…

    1. Yeah, PAD ran photos in the column as printed in CBG, but not when the column was reprinted in the first BID book. The photos were too dark and grainy in my photocopy of the column for me to put up here.
      .
      And this was the last of the columns reprinted in the first BID book. From now until we get to the 2001 columns, they will all be never-before-reprinted.

  2. “We believe that this experience aside, you have no reason to brand DC as homophobic, and that we have exhibited a sincere (as opposed to simply politically correct) commitment to non-discrimination based on sexual preference… I hope you will accept our apology for this incident, and continue to be a satisfied customer.”
    .
    I’ve always felt that this statement from Levitz was basically his way of saying that Rich was acting on his own and not representing the company in his obvious bias. And, that the whole trademark issue was Rich’s backpedaling once called on the carpet in the office.
    .
    Theno

  3. “…your possible sexual orientation.”
    .
    Isn’t THAT an awkward turn of phrase.
    .
    I dunno, I found the statement a bit lacking… they inform him that “you have no reason to brand DC as homophobic”, but never answer the basic contradiction in their own statement; if, as they acknowledge, costumes are commonplace and usually accepted by them at conventions, why was this guy singled out?
    .
    Also, I’m kind of shocked that given the form-fitting nature of the Catwoman costume, no one could tell he was a guy… I mean, you can fake a lot, but as Shakira said, the hips don’t lie.

    1. Oh you dont know how effective can people transform. And how oblivious can we be to details that once pointed out seem to be obvious. That’s after all the art of deception (in the most possitive sense of the word), making you look where I want you to look and not anywhere else.
      .
      Over the years I worked managing a booth at conventions Ive met many Tv and Ts cosplayers. Seems comic and manga are very popular between young tg oriented people and on many transexual beauty contests there are superhero impersonation challenges.
      .
      Specially heartwarming was a philipino kid who’s been attending Madrid Manga Con for years dressed up as different female anime characters with the full support of her mom (who walked a few step behinds, ever protective). That kid was too young (around 16) to initiate corrective procedures but during the Con she could do her best and pulled out a great, cute female persona, live a day like she wanted her life to be.

    2. Not so. Was a young fellow in Nashville fandom who frequently appeared in various female costumes. (Back before the time this column originally appeared.)
      .
      Not altogether infrequently, people who knew him wouldn’t be absolutely sure it was he until they spoke to him.
      .
      When he showed up in a particularly well-fitting “naughty nurse” outfit, someone asked him about the hips and derrière. (I was nearby.)
      .
      He remarked as how there were quite a number of silicone and/or foam rubber appliances on the market if you knew where to shop.
      .
      The really irritating part from many people’s POV was that, not only did he make a very sexy girl, but he was a disgustingly handsome when he wore male clothes.
      .
      Don’t know what’s happened with him or the rest of the Nashville gang (except Ken Moore, dammit); i’ve been out of fandom – mostly from geographical isolation and lack of money – long enough that i’ve lost touch with almost all my old friends and acquaintances.
      .
      (Pretty sure Mrs David would know of whom i speak.)

      1. We could also mention Bailey Jay, who as a teen was labeled “linen trap” in sites like 4chan for her appereances dressed as a japanese schoolgirl in conventionsTG and now is a succesful pornstar.

      2. He’s doing pretty well Mike. He is still living in Nashville and does his DJ thing on occasion at some of the local clubs. He still does really great drag.

        Most of the rest of the Blackpools are doing well as well. I see some of them at DragonCon and ChattaCon when I get down there. We all turned out to be decent adults.

        Ru is in a league of his own. He ruled the drag scene in Atlanta and managed to make quite a career of it. He was a darling to work with oh so many years ago and I am sure that he still is.

      3. Well, i expected most of you to turn out as at LEAST “decent adults”.
        .
        Based on the fact that i don’t expect to ever get any kind of real job again (nd i don’t qualify for disability due to not enough work credits), i’ll be starting early-retirement Social Security the first of next year; maybe i’ll be able to afford the occasional con then.
        .
        Or even JazzFest…

      4. Weber–

        Have you tried applying for Supplemental Security Income (SSI)? You don’t need any real work experience for that. (It doesn’t pay much, though.)

      5. Warner – i believe that SSI considers family income, and Kate makes *way* too much for us to qualify.

    3. Speaking from personal experience here. If you’re a male with a thin body and your hands are not too big, then it only takes the right props and the right training to pass as a woman reasonably well, even better if you’re not going to stay close to any one person for too long (like hours).

      And I feel bad for “Catwoman”.

      Most times I suspect it’s not that company execs are strongly biased one way or another, it’s just that they’re spineless, in terrible fear that one concerned parent will freak out because his kid has a lunchbox with a character that has any sort of association to any gay thing.

      But like PAD said, it’s intriguing that a little crossdressing fun in a convention was frowned upon, but a published story had prostitution and S&M.

      1. Well, it was written by Frank Miller. I often suspect that his contracts specify that he gets to turn one established character into a junky lesbian whørë/pornstar who’s going to die from AIDS.
        .
        I really sort of think that i’m a bit suspicious that FM doesn’t really like women…

  4. I wish Greenberg would’ve just stood up to the DC people and refused to kick her out. (I know it can be really hard to stand up to people, though, and they were bigwigs. I know a lot of people are intimidated by that.)

    1. Unfortunately, in the Real World, the choice between taking a moral stance and continuing to run your convention and provide things the attendees like – like DC artists and writers and product – often has no good answers.
      .
      There’s a special place in a Very Uncomfortably Hot Place reserved for people who put other people in such situations.

Comments are closed.